Darwin's theory of evolution is one of the leftists' tools to refute a creator. They say that is not possible to read the bible and use that book's chronology. Earth being created in six days. Time is used here not as logically assumed but more as an order of how things came about. The six days are merely six major events. Reading the first book "Genesis" one can see the discription of what some call the Big Bang Theory. "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." The earth was formless, without form empty darkness was everywhere. God said let there be light and there was. So out of nothing there was a great explosion of light. The big bang. The rest of the second chapter tells of the evolution of the solar system. The formation of earth, out of gases to solidity. Water was added from the gases. Hydrogen and oxygen both gases form water H2O. Absolutely logical interpretation.
As the tale goes eventually man is formed. But this is not immediate because there are two creation stories with subtle changes of wording. It could be that translation is bad resulting in the two creations but I think that it has purpose. The first creation is of male and female not neccisarily the finished product. The second creation is when the creatures are called man and woman. I see a very strong possibility of the originals being evolved into the current being.
See the Bible just taught evolution.
Now another of Darwin's theories was survival of the fittest. Why then does the left not espose to this theory as well. As evolution goes the strongest mate and create a stronger and stronger species. However the left tends to prop up the weak, mating together to create a weaker species.
Is it not strange that the left props up a man for one train of thought then totally opposite end on the other. the funny thing about this paradox is that evolution does not continue when the species gets weaker it just dies off